As a trial tech, I am sometimes required to travel to places
that I would otherwise never think of visiting, let alone for weeks at a time.
So while it’s always good to win a trial, it is especially sweet if I have been
away from home, doing little more than going back and forth from the hotel to
the courtroom, and feeling a little like Bill Murray’s character in the movie Groundhog Day.
After recently going through this experience, maybe I should
not have been surprised that it seemed more satisfying than a normal win. However,
upon reflection, I also feel that I helped to bring the legal profession into
the 21st century.
Not only did we present documents in our standard laptop and
projector courtroom setup, complete with interactive monitor for the witness, but
this time we added a microscope into the mix for a few days. Using the
microscope, our pathologist expert was able to show actual pathology slides to
the jury, and explain with visual detail why he thought there was a breakdown
in the diagnosis procedure. Using the pen on the interactive monitor, he would
circle the area of the cell he was discussing to direct the jury’s attention. I
would then capture an image of the slide with pen markings and save it for
later use. Pretty cool, right?
Well, I thought
so. The court, however, was struck by the speed and simplicity of presenting
documents to everyone in the courtroom at once, and who could blame them? It’s
such a simple yet effective concept. When I saw this for the first time, I
could not believe document presentation was not being done this way everywhere.
As it turns out, we trial techs are riding this wave of technology into the
courtroom. Perhaps it’s just that we are the wave! Now before you start
imagining my head inflating like a balloon, consider the following statements,
copied here exactly from the court transcripts on a day that I was asked by our
client not to be present in court.


When I returned to court the next day, the court reporter
said that my name came up quite a bit during proceedings the previous day. I smiled
and thought – “this is a joke, right?” Usually if the court notices me, it’s
only to ask how long the video will be or to ask me to move a piece of
equipment, so I was caught off guard – I mean, a large part of my job is to be
invisible. Yet the court clerks, reporters, my clients, the opposing counsel
and company continued to tell me how during the previous day, the court
mentioned me and how great a job I was doing. Of course, certain members of the
opposing counsel were quite sarcastic, as one would expect.
Taking all this with a grain of salt, I couldn’t help but notice
the difference we made in the courtroom procedure. Compared to other courtrooms
using paper only, this courtroom’s procedure was very efficient. However, I did
feel sorry for the clerk who had to go through many bankers’ boxes to find a
page of a file in question as I put it up for the court instantly. The judge eventually
decided that it was better to show the page as soon as I could instead of wait
for the clerk.
As the trial drew to a close, the judge actually called me
aside after court had concluded one day. He wanted to personally express his
gratitude for the way I was able to quickly present documents digitally, and
generally help move things along while keeping the jury engaged. Now if only
all courtrooms (and attorneys) were as appreciative as this one… Anyway, that’s
the dream, and this is what led me to obtain a copy of the transcript above.
Personal interactions like I had on this last
trial remind me to be more impressed with what I’m doing as I see it through
the perspective of someone experiencing technology in the courtroom for the
first time. Someday, hopefully for the legal system and for Trial Technologies,
Inc., this “new technology” that we bring to courtrooms will be just another common
courtroom procedure; albeit one that saves time and money. Wouldn’t THAT be cool?!